Use this logo for $85.00 per day; paid every day. Call us today. After 30 years, you own it. We would keep only two locations. We are now offering exclusive distributorships in some West Indian Islands. Frost Byte™: This offer is made first and foremost to my siblings since we are not the sad bastards. Buy the whole franchise concept and chain and own it forever by paying us $85.00 per day for 40 years and you will get a document confirming your exclusive distributorship for the name in your state or province once you have paid all the monies. You will be able to open additional new locations once you sign and start payment. The agreement also involves payment of $60.00 (3 $20.00 notes) per day for the inaugural location with a yearly 2% increase. This amount is to be paid by the individual franchise owner. All subsequent locations will pay 120.00 per day with a 2% yearly increase. After ten years you will continue to pay $100.00 per day per location. Than...
Click here for more. ''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. We need a consumer, whatever the consumer and the boss does not mind if it's an African or China man as funded with consumer money from their home country; but he says what's wrong if it's an American, all Americans and Canadians that are funded with income support/ consumer money just as the African and China man is funded ? I was inspired by the English man, John Locke, who said that our rights involve life, liberty, health and government. However, is it reasonably foreseeable for McDonalds to contemplate a security risk to its patrons due to a potential bombing at one of its restaurants such that if a bombing ensued, the patrons would be able to claim in Tort in the suggestions that McDonald's should have known? We do not hold such a risk to be self-evident or foreseeable where we would say McDonalds should have known and nor does the passenger in the bus hit in the back by the tractor trailer have any chance to say the bus company should have known it was going to be hit but the bus company who is a victim along with the passengers could say the tractor trailer driver should have known that if he was not careful he would have hit the bus and caused injury since the bus and other vehicles and their passenger should be in the tractor trailers reasonable contemplation. CLICK here.
Click here for more. '' We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. We need a consumer, whatever the consumer and the boss does not mind if it's an African or China man as funded with consumer money from their home country; but he says what's wrong if it's an American, all Americans and Canadians that are funded with income support/ consumer money just as the African and China man is funded ? I was inspired by the English man, John Locke, who said that our rights involve life, liberty, health and government. However, is it reasonably foreseeable for McDonalds to contemplate a security risk to its patrons due to a potential bombing at one of its restaurants such that if a bombing ensued, the patrons would be able to claim in Tort in the suggestions that McDonald'...